
Hopefully issue #80 will avoid all of this frustration and confusion in the future. Not many others would/will stick with it ya' know. If I didn't have such respect and admiration for Brendan and wanting to see him succeed, and if I weren't so anxious to see more competition against Google, I would have moved on the moment after having my first issues with Brave as I did. Many are looking for an out but there isn't a suitable one.īrendan and you bbondy are aware of that. The ones not afraid to try anything, dig in, contribute, stay loyal, and help build. I see Mozilla making that mistake with some to a lot aspects with Firefox and they're pissing off and losing the early adopters types and power users. While I'm not a metrics expert, in my opinion and experience, you have to be very careful here and not always go by raw stats. I'm using a PC less than a decade old running 32-bit Windows 7 with the latest 32-bit versions of Firefox, the " cutting edge" Nightly, Thunderbird, Daily, and so on and I hardly feel as if I'm behind the times using old tech. Just kidding and trying to lighten it up. I think that it's brave that, oh, wait, Brave, ah ok.

It's probably easier to enter into the cola market and be successful then the browser one. It does go without saying but I'm saying anyway that Brave of course can't afford to with the field that its in. Also, the Windows PC covers 64-bit and 32-bit pcs and the version of Windows must be 7 or above. I hope that y'all do provide 32-bit versions eventually and not alienate anyone.
